[month-index] [thread-index] [prev] [next] [thread-prev]

joe@obilivan.net wrote:

>
>
> Lee Elson wrote:
>
>> Whiteman airport (in Southern California) had a VOR A approach with a
>> GPS overlay (refered to as the GPS-A) for quite awhile. About 3 months
>> ago, it was changed to exclude the GPS part (dumb, IMHO).
>
> The "dumb" is policy; i.e., the overlay program is interim, thus when a
> standalone IAP is developed for the same runway (or for circling in a case
> like this) the overlay authorization is removed from the ground-based IAP.

Why? I mean, what purpose is served by the interim solution? Is the
overlay removed if and when another GPS approach into that airport is
TERPed?

- Andrew

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous Message:: Re: The widdle plane gets confused
Next Message:: DME choices?
Previous message in thread:: Re: ATC- clueless again