![]() |
Download your free copy of the award winning ForPilots LogBook program today! |
Yes, its 1998. Good point. Raytheon is about 5 years late already on this
contract and the are now trying to take credit for finishing early. What a joke. They are "well ahead of schedule". Thats because they are blaming the govt for all their delays. I used to work for Hughes which was acquired by Raytheon. Things immediately went down the tubes. I quit that piece of S__T company within the first year. "flyer" news:5e700d2d.0210111327.6c8ec04f@posting.google.com... > WAAS has PASSED the critical 60 day test and Raytheon can now turn the > system over to the FAA in February, well ahead of schedule. Raytheon > has > encouraged the FAA to approve WAAS for IFR in June, instead of next > December. > > This from the AOPA web site: > > As soon as WAAS is approved for IFR, FAA expects to issue a "blanket > approval" permitting all IFR approach-approved WAAS receivers to fly > the LNAV/VNAV minima now being published on some approach charts. FAA > will soon begin to publish "LPV" approaches, a new approach type that > has lower minima and can be flown only with WAAS equipment. LPV > approaches will likely have minima of 250 feet and three quarters of > mile visibility with approach lights and precision runway markings. > > So my question is this. I have a WAAS-ready Garmin 430 box. What > will > happen when WAAS is activated? Will I sent the thing back to Garmin > for > an update that loads new software? What will the box do that it > doesnt > do now? How will the VNAV information be displayed? |
| [BACK] | Return to the ForPilots.com archive page |