[month-index] [thread-index] [prev] [next] [thread-prev] [thread-next]

Agreed.


"Thomas J. Paladino Jr." wrote:
>
> > Not to worry - the movie doesnt really follow the plot of the book too
> > closely. Instead of Middle Eastern terrorists, the bad guys are neo-Nazis,
> > and the bomb is now a long-lost US-made suitcase nuke. Finally, their
> target
> > is Baltimore instead of the books Denver. And from what Ive seen in
> > reviews, the movie is pretty bad.
>
> Neo-Nazis? Come on here. That is ridiculous. Is the world really in any
> kind of danger from neo-nazis? This flagrant political correctness makes me
> sick. Why not use middle eastern terrorists? Most of the worlds terorists,
> certainly the most dangerous ones, come from the middle east, so it stands
> to reason that if you want to make a terrorist movie, there should be some
> islamic extremists cast as the bad guys. But not in Hollywood, I suppose. We
> cannot risk offending the terrorists, because that would be wrong. So to get
> the publics mind off of the war in the middle east, cast the bad guys as
> european white males. Nobody really cares about offending them. The whole
> thing really makes me nauseous.

--
AI Nut
I love my country but I fear my government.
If youre being passed on the right hand side, move over a lane, Dummy. (US)

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous Message:: Re: Mid-West Fly-In Camping Recommendations?
Next Message:: Re: PILOTS, TIME TO STRIKE?
Previous message in thread:: Re: Is The Sum of All Fears as bad as it looks like it will be?
Next message in thread:: Re: Is The Sum of All Fears as bad as it looks like it will be?