![]() |
Download your free copy of the award winning ForPilots LogBook program today! |
I once asked them about folding wings and got a rather curt reply. I think
they are not messing with what theyve got. Fr. John "dave B." news:39fd0f59.16455375@news.tomatoweb.com... > There have been a few reports of upright engine installations on the > Challenger, but not much is said about them. Im not an expert on it, > but after hearing all the talk back and forth on the subject it became > clear that the problem is that the Challenger is not designed to > handle an upright mount. The reason I see is that the thrust line for > the air flow from the prop to the tail is built in for a engine down > installtion and trying to raise the prop by using the larger redrive > is more than likely the highest you can raise it and still have proper > air flow over the tail. > > I know that drag is a big consideration, but like you I see other > ULs with upright engines and wonder why the Challenger doesnt have > one. It doesnt make much sense. It would require new tooling and > design and maybe the factory cant afford it, to make the changes to > update the current model, that is over fifteen years old? > > dave b. > > > > > > > > > > On 30 Oct 2000 04:31:41 GMT, jarunnles@aol.com (JARunnles) wrote: > > >Hi all I have a Challenger II that I have just put on a new 503 DCDI. I have a > >problum. I have ordered the new tall redrive from the factory over two months > >ago and have still not got it. Dave said that the place that makes the drives > >is having trouble with there machines. What I would like to know have any of > >you Challenger owners ever mounted your motor up right and used the Rotax gear > >box? I have looked at the motor mount for the single place T-Bird and it looks > >like it will work good on the Challenger. But I would like to talk to someone > >that has mounted theres upright and see what it did to the handling in flight. > >Thanks > |
| [BACK] | Return to the ForPilots.com archive page |