[month-index] [thread-index] [prev] [next] [thread-prev] [thread-next]

Replying to myself, I know, but I got the right figures, from von Mises
Theory of Flight. The exponents are 1/5 and 2/5

Rgds

Javier


"J.S." escribió en el mensaje
news:ad831n$uh994$1@ID-90320.news.dfncis.de...
>
> "J.S." escribió (...)
> >
> > "Barry Palmer" escribió (...)
> > >
> > > The best way to see the complexity involved is to look up NACA test
> data
> > on a
> > > variable pitch prop. (NACA TR 640)
> >
> > ++++++++++
> > Thanks for the reference. Ill download it from the NACA site.
>
> I downloaded the Technical Report 640. Highly interesting and
informative.
> Unfortunately, the document is scanned at a relatively low resolution and
> some exponents are illegible. Could someone around here tell me what are
the
> values of those exponents in the expression for Cs in the appendix, page
> 568?. There are some 3s there that might be 5s, or the other way
around.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Javier
>
> .
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Javier
> > >
> > >(...)
> > >
> > >
> > > Barry Palmer, for > > > HREF="http://members.aol.com/sevtec/sev/skmr.html">Sevtec
> >
> >
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous Message:: Re: Aero Connections Magazine is online
Next Message:: Re: The more prop pitch, the more power absorbed...
Previous message in thread:: Re: The more prop pitch, the more power absorbed...
Next message in thread:: Re: The more prop pitch, the more power absorbed...